01.21.08

Git ‘Er Done

Posted in Economic at 10:05 pm by admin

Do you want to see RedState get the recognition it deserves so that it can continue to thrive and prosper as a community?

Do you want to see Jeff Emanuel receive the praise that he is due as an outstanding miliblogger?

Then vote. Vote early. Vote often. And tell your friends to vote early and often too.

VOTE FOR REDSTATE HERE.

VOTE FOR JEFF EMANUEL HERE.

Read the rest of this entry »

“Dennis Kucinich is on a quest of his own. He sees flying saucers and he acts like one, too”

Posted in Economic at 9:15 pm by admin

Representative Kucinich is going to bring this up in public, every chance he gets, for the rest of this primary season:

Kucinich’s Cheney Impeachment Resolution Stays Alive in House, Moved to Committee

WASHINGTON Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich expressed satisfaction Tuesday with a series of procedural twists on the House floor that resulted in the Ohio congressman’s impeachment articles against Vice President Dick Cheney being sent for committee review.

A series of strategic maneuvers on both sides of the partisan aisle ended with a 218-194 vote along party lines to deliver the impeachment resolution to the House Judiciary Committee, the panel of jurisdiction for such matters.

“This vote sends a message that the administration’s conduct in office is no longer unchallenged,” Kucinich said after the vote.

Kucinich savored the victory, saying that Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers had reassured him and backers of the resolution “that he would in fact launch an impeachment inquiry.” But Conyers told FOX News that he would announce his decision on Wednesday after speaking with House Democratic leaders.

(Via Don Surber; G/T: Instapundit)

Now, I will tell you a secret: this time last year, I was morosely sitting at my computer screen and wondering how the Democrats had managed to keep going when Congress wasn’t theirs to command. I worried that I’d still be wondering, a year later, and so I am. I just never figured that the only change to the question would be that it would be in present tense instead of past.

Read on.

For those tuning in late, the short version is that Rep. Kucinich - who has parlayed the ability to say things progressives want to hear into a nice little business for himself (H/T: Protein Wisdom)* - had introduced a call for Cheney’s impeachment. Old news, and this was all set to die: Speaker Pelosi and Rep. Hoyer have better things to do than cater to the delusions of the impeach-em-all crowd, and they’ve gotten away with ignoring it before, so why not now? So, Hoyer sets out to quash it - and then, as Don notes, “Republicans were all set to help him until it occurred to them, screw Hoyer. What has he done for Republicans?”

Don thinks that S-CHIP was the proximate cause. Me, I’m guessing nostalgia. The GOP loved letting the BDS sufferers in Congress bring up their pet causes to votes, solely to watch the rest of Democrats scurry for the floorboards. Normally, we can’t do that anymore… but That Magnificent Basta*d Shaddeg and the rest guessed that the progressive faction of the Democrats was simply incapable of voting no on impeachment proceedings, and lo! - they were correct. So, it was set up for a floor vote… and then the Democrats scurried. Alas, gaining nominal control of Congress last year means that they have more procedural options, which is why it was sent to Judiciary in order to die an ignominious death. Comparing the tabling resolution with the one sending it to committee might be interesting, for those progressives out there wondering which of their purported Representatives are most likely to break under pressure; not that any of our lurkers are interested in doing as I suggest. Why, no. Not at all. Even when you know you want to…

But I’m being mean - and, do you know something? I’m genuinely curious: what in Hell are you people doing still supporting the Democratic Party? We’re eleven months in for this new, supposedly improved Congress, and I still get to write stories about the way that the netroots get betrayed by their leadership. I may be actually writing more of them, because I’m getting more legitimate chances to do so. I’m certainly not gnashing my teeth over the way my cause has been stymied: the defense hawks haven’t even been slowed down. Put it another way: you people out there in the netroots hate me - well, not me, personally (although I imagine that at least one or two people out there do), but rather the faction of the GOP that I represent. Hating us even seems to be - from an outside, prejudiced, and amused perspective, of course - the basis for your lives.

So why are you giving us cheap victories?

Moe

*As I’ve noted before, I hate the message but respect the player. You have to: he games the system at a level that leaves his competitors in the dust. Shoot, he even used it to marry above his level. Credit where credit is due.

Originaly from Source

The Dollar is Now the World’s Most Hated Currency

Posted in Economic at 8:25 pm by admin

The US dollar is in a full-fledged rout. It’s trading at historic lows against every major currency except the Japanese yen, and against a raft of minor currencies as well. Dollar-prices for commodities like oil and gold are at record highs.

Dollar weakness is an expected consequence of the Federal Reserve’s two recent cuts in its benchmark short-term interest rate. But dollar sentiment around the world has become extraordinarily negative over the past week or so, and people are starting to pile on.

Is this behavior normal? Or is something new and different going on?

More…

First some numbers. This morning, the dollar reached lows of nearly $1.47 against the euro, $2.09 against sterling, $1.10 against the Canadian loonie. The yen strengthened to below 114, and the Chinese yuan touched 7.44, from 7.47 at the beginning of the week. The Aussie dollar and the Norwegian krone also strengthened against the greenback, about which more later.

The basic story here is really rather simple. As an asset, the dollar has become less attractive because of lower interest rates and perceived poor economic fundamentals in the US. (The latter is code for “everyone thinks the reduction in housing values is going to cause a recession.”)

In addition, huge writedowns in securities backed by US home-mortgages are causing pain in portfolios all over the world. Many of these securities are denominated in US dollars. There’s no place for these assets to go since there’s no liquid secondary market for them (and there never has been, so that’s not a distress signal in itself). But holders of mortgage-backs face pressure to increase reserves against their losses and they do so by selling other dollar-denominated assets.

One of the most basic features of financial markets is momentum. The old cliche’ is that it makes as much sense to buck a trending market as it does to stand in front of a runaway freight train.

And so you get stories like the one from China (quoted in the article I linked above). Cheng Siwei, a senior legislative official, came out and said that China would be diversifying its foreign exchange holdings away from dollars and into stronger currencies.

Now Cheng has a reputation as a loose cannon, and the People’s National Congress is not involved in China’s monetary policymaking. His statement probably has more shock value than anything else.

That’s because China has already been doing what he says, since about the beginning of the year. They have already reduced their holdings of long-dated US Treasury debt to about $400 billion. That’s not a big change from where it was, but the direction is what matters. China no longer participates in auctions of new Treasury debt as much as they used to.

They also have a $200 billion “sovereign wealth fund,” which is increasingly seeking new investments not in dollars. This is an interesting kind of a vehicle. It’s basically a sterilization fund, where countries that make too much money park it, so it won’t cause too much domestic inflation. (Norway, with its huge revenues from oil exports, also has one. Hugo Chavez needs one, but he’s not smart enough to know that.)

Speaking of oil, that’s another big part of the dollar momentum story. We’ve had a few discussions about this on RedState lately, and I’ve made the point that speculative buying of crude oil futures is distorting the market for that commodity. Such buying is largely a response to dollar weakness (and the anticipation of further weakness). As we get further into the week, I’m hearing a lot of people confirm this view and I’m basically convinced of it now. Oil will probably hit $100 in the near-term, and may go considerably higher.

Another thing that has changed recently: I see a consensus forming among business people that Hillary Clinton will be the next President of the United States. That’s not news. However, the sentiment is also growing that her regime will seriously damage the US economy in absolute terms, and in terms of our global competitiveness. Practical result: some people are scaling back their growth projections (and their investment plans) for 2009 and beyond.

Inflation

The oddest and most striking thing about the current dollar trend is inflation. You can’t help seeing that inflation is anywhere from a serious concern (continental Europe) to a blazing inferno (China). Except in the United States.

The US, Japan, and perhaps the UK are the only major economies in the world with no significant inflation in evidence. (I’m discounting US food-price inflation, which is partly driven by government ethanol policy. Japan is simply on the floor economically, with almost no dynamism except in their export sector.) Australia, Norway, India, Russia, and many others have serious inflation issues that are causing them to raise interest rates, which adds still more downward pressure to the dollar.

And oil-states that don’t actually have economies, like Saudi Arabia, are feeling the pain in a different way. Since most of them peg their domestic currencies to the dollar, they now have way too much money as well. They’re seriously considering diversifying reserves out of dollars too.

Because the global economy is tightly integrated with the American one, the effects of dollar weakness are being transmitted like plague to every other economy. We’re exporting inflationary pressure instead of experiencing it at home, and it’s possible that this is the cause, not the result, of higher interest rates abroad.

It’s a perfect storm. The broad question we have to ask is: will the dollar find a floor, or are we in the middle of a long trend that will fundamentally re-align trade flows around the world?

At this point, all I can do is pose the question. I have to admit I don’t know the answer. If you’ve been around markets at all, you know that they will always surprise you. If we get an unexpected improvement in the US economic outlook, the resulting firmer interest rates will probably halt the dollar’s decline, in the near term at least.

But the center of gravity in the global economy is marching south and east. As the largest economy in the world, we’re still the most important player in the global game, and will be for a long time to come. However, we’re no longer the most dynamic. The American business world, which is extremely good at adapting to changing conditions, will have a lot of adapting to do.

We’re now in the early stages of a secular transformation that, in its scale and impact, will match the Industrial Revolution and the late-19th Century exodus from farms to cities.

Originaly from Source

01.20.08

Red Tide Sweeps Mississippi

Posted in Economic at 9:55 pm by admin

Last night, Mississippi and Louisiana finished what states like Georgia and South Carolina started. They succumbed to the Red Tide (no, dang it, not the Crimson Tide sucessfully beaten back last Saturday. Geaux Tigers!).

In Louisiana, in a historic defeat for the Democrats, Bobby Jindal made it to the Governor’s Mansion without a runoff. In Mississippi, last night, the GOP picked up all but one state wide seats, returning Haley Barbour to the Governor’s Mansion for a second term.

Like Georgia in 2004, this is a first for Mississppi since Reconstruction. The death of the Republican Party seems greatly exaggerated.

Read the rest of this entry »

Brownback to Endorse McCain. Pat Robertson to Endorse Rudy.

Posted in Economic at 9:05 pm by admin

Sam Brownback will endorse John McCain today in Iowa.

Pat Robertson will endorse Rudy. Read that one again. Yeah.

Read the rest of this entry »

Blogging From GITMO: The Trial of Omar Ahmed Khadr

Posted in Economic at 8:15 pm by admin

Over the next several days Ill be at the military detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as an observer to the proceedings against Omar Ahmed Khadr, who was taken into custody on the battlefields of Afghanistan. Congress established military commissions for unlawful combatants held at GITMO that the government wants to try as criminals.

Read on . . .

Waiting for the plane yesterday at Andrews Air Force Base, I saw one of the first signs that the government is trying to do things right — protect American citizens and safeguard the rule of law. There looks to be almost three dozen people on the flight many of whom are journalists (mostly from Canada; Khadr is Canadian by birth). The rest of the folks are like me, non-governmental observers (NGOs). The NGOs are an alphabet soup, everything from the VFW to various human rights groups. The point is that the U.S. government invited all these representatives from the outside world to come to Guantanamo to see how the commissions work. Providing that kind of transparency is what honest governments do — no secret trials, no show trials.

I arrived at the Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay where the U.S. military holds 320 unlawful combatants. Most were captured in Afghanistan (none are from Iraq). All of them have had a hearing to determine whether they are a threat to the United States. They also have annual hearings to determine whether their detention is still warranted. Indeed, a number of detainees have been cleared for release and sent back to their countries or other states willing to accept them. All of these tribunals are conducted by the military for crimes committed on the battlefield. All the detainees here are in military custody.

Continued on the jump…

The Pentagon has been trying to conduct these trials, called Military Commissions, since 2004, but a series of legal disputes reaching all the way to the Supreme Court required Congress to draft legislation authorizing the commissions. That done — the government thinks the process is back on track. Well see. The Khadr trial is supposed to start tomorrow.

At dinner last night I ate in The Galley, a mess hall on this part of the island. It reminded me of why I am so glad I am retired from the military. Military chow is still military chow.

Eating with the soldiers, sailor, and marines stationed here, however, is also a reminder of who is running the detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay. They are the guards, interrogators, medical staff, prosecutors and defense attorneys. They are charged with keeping the detainees safe and healthy. They are responsible for protecting the staff against the violence periodically attempted by the detainees. They are responsible for collecting intelligence that might save the lives of Americans and their friends and allies. They are responsible for ensuring that the rights of the detainees are not violated. They must ensure that justice is done — in the Military Commissions and all the other legal proceedings that happen here. They are our sons and daughters, and colleagues, and friends. Many are citizen-soldiers in the National Guard or Reserve. They are great soldiers in another great generation — and regardless of what anyone thinks about the need for the facilities here, we should all be proud of the service they are performing. They are doing a magnificent job.

Stay tuned for more updates soon.

Carafano is a defense policy expert at The Heritage Foundation.

Originaly from Source

01.19.08

100,000 Strong for Earmark Reform

Posted in Economic at 9:45 pm by admin

Senator Jim DeMint is trying to get people to sign his petition for Earmarks Reform. Called the 100,000 Strong for Earmark Reform, Senator DeMint wants to show the Senate that people really do care about this issue.

You can sign the petition here.

I spoke to Senator DeMint the other day about his petition. I have signed. I hope you will. You can hear the whole interview with Senator DeMint here.

or listen here:

Read the rest of this entry »

Okay, So We Have Problems In Pakistan

Posted in Economic at 8:55 pm by admin

To wit:

Gen. Pervez Musharraf declared a state of emergency in Pakistan on Saturday, suspending the constitution, replacing the chief justice before a crucial Supreme Court ruling on his future as president, and cutting communications in the capital.

Pakistan’s main opposition leader, Benezir Bhutto, flew back to the country from Dubai and was sitting in an airplane at Karachi’s airport, waiting to see if she would be arrested or deported, a spokesman said. Dozens of paramilitary troops surrounded her house.

Seven of the 18 Supreme Court judges immediately condemned the emergency, which suspended the current constitution. Police blocked entry to the Supreme Court building and later took the chief justice and other judges away in a convoy, witnesses said.

The government halted all television transmissions in major cities other than state-controlled Pakistan TV. Telephone service in the capital, Islamabad, was cut.

A copy of the emergency order obtained by The Associated Press justified the declaration on the grounds that “some members of the judiciary are working at cross purposes with the executive” and “weakening the government’s resolve” to fight terrorism.

Obviously, this situation will require restraint on all sides for the various parties to be able to sit down and settle their disputes. But the long term issue at stake here appears to be Musharraf’s fear that by relinquishing his position as Army chief of staff in anticipation of renewing his term as President of Pakistan, he will give up massive amounts of political power and in fact be vulnerable to a coup in the future.

American policy should remain consistent in urging Musharraf to step down as Army chief of staff. Musharraf will keep finding reasons not to do so. In the immediate term, this spells deep trouble for Pakistan and a significant challenge for American foreign policy. And the fact that this crisis is occurring while American and Pakistani forces are working to further curb al Qaeda’s reach and influence makes resolving the issue all the more important and urgent.

Originaly from Source

“The Petraeus Curve”

Posted in Economic at 8:05 pm by admin

Don’t look now, but things have improved significantly in Iraq. And the following passage is highly significant:

The current achievements, and they are achievements, are being treated as almost an embarrassment in certain quarters. The entire context of the contest for the Democratic nomination for president has been based on the conclusion that Iraq is an absolute disaster and the first task of the next president is to extricate the United States at maximum speed. Democrats who voted for the war have either repudiated their past support completely (John Edwards) or engaged in a convoluted partial retraction (Hillary Clinton). Congressional Democrats have spent most of this year trying (and failing) to impose a timetable for an outright exit. In Britain, in a somewhat more subtle fashion admittedly, Gordon Brown assumed on becoming the Prime Minister that he should send signals to the voters that Iraq had been “Blair’s War”, not one to which he or Britain were totally committed.

I don’t for a moment think that we have run out of challenges to overcome in Iraq. But it is sheer folly not to admit that since the implementation of the surge and General Petraeus’s counterinsurgency strategy, there have been significant improvements in the quality of life in the country. And I wonder–as the article does–why it is that more people don’t celebrate those improvements.

Those people will have to be the ones who give the answer to that question. But for my part, I can only surmise that sometimes, the pain of being wrong can be so overwhelming that certain people can’t bring themselves to celebrate what is so obviously celebratory. And given all of the comments that the surge was failing (many of which were delivered well before the surge was fully implemented), there may well be a lot of people who are gradually realizing that they were wrong about the surge and about the future of Iraq in general.

Originaly from Source

01.18.08

Clearer signs of success, plenty of clouds in the forecast

Posted in Economic at 10:20 pm by admin