01.28.08

In Which The Future Of Free Trade Still Looks Grim

Posted in Economic at 9:35 pm by admin

So the House of Representatives has approved a free trade pact with Peru. That is good news but the following passage does not exactly augur well for future free trade agreements:

Democrats generally have resisted free trade deals they blame for job losses and trade deficits, and their rise to power in January was seemingly a blow to the Bush administration’s aggressive free trade agenda. But the situation changed in May when the administration agreed to Democratic demands that labor rights and the environment be core elements of any future agreements.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said she had long opposed trade deals with China and others that had led to huge trade imbalances while doing little to open up those countries politically. But, she said, “when I saw an opportunity for us to have labor and environmental standards as a core part of our trade agreements, it marked a drastic difference from what even a Democratic president was willing to give on that score.”

(Emphasis mine.) Of course, this now means that “labor and environmental standards” will be part and parcel of trade agreements for the foreseeable

BREAKING: Benazir Bhutto under “Detention Order” (read: House Arrest)

Posted in Economic at 8:45 pm by admin

…because they’re getting worse in Pakistan:

Pakistan: Bhutto under house detention
By ZARAR KHAN

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - Pakistani police placed opposition leader Benazir Bhutto under house arrest Friday, uncoiling barbed wire in front of her Islamabad home and reportedly rounding up 5,000 of her supporters to block a mass protest against emergency rule.

Bhutto tried twice to leave by car but was blocked by police after a scuffle with her supporters who tried to remove a barricade. The former prime minister had planned to address a rally in nearby Rawalpindi, defying a ban on public gatherings.

Kamal Shah, a top Interior Ministry official, said a district magistrate had served a “detention order” on Bhutto who last month escaped an assassination attempt by suicide bombers, an attack that killed more than 145 people so she could not leave her home.

Oh, joy.

Read on.

The ostensible claim is that Bhutto has been placed under a “detention order” to protect her from suicide bombers - which is unfortunately not an absolutely, completely, 100% absurd scenario, thanks to last month’s attacks on her - not arrest. You can believe as much of that as you like. I’d like to still think that this might be all staged for the cameras, but I don’t think that we should be counting on that and I emphatically don’t think that the US government should be counting on that, either.

The WaPo has more details on all of this mess: there are precisely two bright spots in all of it. The first is that we’re not at the “people getting shot wholesale” stage. Yet. The second is that there is still the vague sense that neither side is quite yet willing to do something really, really stupid - and irrevocable. Whether either, or both, are bright enough to lighten Pakistan’s gloom remains to be seen.

Moe Lane

PS: On the domestic front: if Senator Barack Obama does not take this opportunity that has fallen into his lap to fulminate about Pakistan, then there is indeed no hope for his candidacy.

Originaly from Source

01.27.08

Thank You Michael Yon-Awesome Photo!

Posted in Economic at 10:16 pm by admin

Michael Yon’s latest dispatch from Iraq, Thanks and Praise, is a wonderful account spreading across the blogosphere. I do not see the account anywhere in the Driveby media. I google news stories, and get only 1 hit, NRO.

Read on.

Michael Yon is making this photograph available to media outlets, such as print publications and cable and television news broadcasts, at no cost for a limited period of time.

Here is a snippet of Michael’s dispatch about this photo.

Thanks and Praise: I photographed men and women, both Christians and Muslims, placing a cross atop the St. Johns Church in Baghdad. They had taken the cross from storage and a man washed it before carrying it up to the dome.

The Anchoress has written her impressions on her blog I completely agree with her, and appreciate her take on this. Here is a snippet of The Anchoress

In truth, we know so little. So much of the information we get from Iraq is filtered and delivered from safe locations. So little of it is unfiltered and delivered from the Iraqi streets.

Yon is delivering Iraq to us from the streets, and hes doing it on donated dimes.

Wretchard compares this photo, in spirit, to the raising of the flag at Iwo Jima. Rand Simberg calls it Pulitzer-worthy. I dont know; Im no judge of such things.

What I see in this picture is something more than a historic moment - I dont even know if thats what we should call it - I see the sort of thing people do when they are neighbors, when they are working together for their neighborhood, for the good of all who live there, and that makes it seem less historic than calmly, wonderfully normal, ordinary, wholesome and sane. I see tolerance, which so many are so certain cannot exist in Iraq - or anywhere in the Middle East. Tolerance in the best sense of the word - converting no one, insisting on nothing beyond ordinary acceptance; tolerance that gives people room to live their lives.

Thank you Michael Yon, Jeff Emmanuel, and others like them who provide a glimpse, a snapshot of events in Iraq that we otherwise will never know about.

Originaly from Source

Pork Busters In The News

Posted in Economic at 9:25 pm by admin

You don’t think you can have an impact? You’re just one person? Come on now, in the age of blogs that’s all changed.

Check out this on the Georgia Porkbusters Project:

These days, one person with access to just email can make a difference. Go here, sign up, and help out.

Read the rest of this entry »

Hillary’s Not Invincible

Posted in Economic at 8:35 pm by admin

The chinks in Hillary Clintons once impenetrable armor have been found. Hillarys opponents have been able to link her stand or lack thereof on issues to reinforce voters doubts about her honesty and electability. Doubts about her positions on Iraq and Iran and her inability to provide straightforward answers on issues such as social security, access to her White House records, and drivers licenses for illegal immigrants have led to what seems like her first losing media cycle of the campaign. Even her husband usually a media darling seemed to stumble as he attempted to defend his wife from ramped up criticism.

While there are questions about the impact of Hillarys performance on voters, what is clear is that the media has abandoned the invincibility story line and her opponents are trying to take advantage.

Some polls do show her lead over Barack Obama shrinking. A CNN poll had her lead down from 30% to 17% while a Washington Post/ABC poll shrank from 33% to 23%. And in the crucial state of Iowa a recent Zogby poll has her clinging to a 28 to 25 lead (down from 30 19) while Rasmussen saw her New Hampshire lead shrink to its lowest level this year

Whatever her national numbers, a loss in Iowa or even a narrow victory in New Hampshire would be a huge setback for the candidate perceived as the presumed nominee. Losing the expectations game can have enormous consequences.

Read on . . .

What should also concern Hillary are voters negative perceptions of her. Polls continue to show her with negatives in the mid to high forties; higher than any of her rivals. Specifically, the Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 43% of voters had a negative perception of her honesty. This seems to indicate that the criticisms are having an effect

Fueling these doubts are questions about her character and her electability and these are the points her opponents are driving home. Organizations like Stop Her Now have been raising the issue of access to White House documents for months, but it was only after the debate that it became an issue in the campaign. After Tim Russert asked Hillary about the issue, Obama went on record as finding her answers a problem and disingenuous thus kicking off another round of media stories questioning why the documents were being held until after the election.

Hillarys need to placate the liberal base has also begun to trip her up. In questions on giving drivers licenses to illegal immigrants Hillary faced a choice between a simple answer and offending key voters. Yes would have left her vulnerable since as much as 77% of the public are opposed to the idea. No, however, would have put her at odds with the liberal Democratic base that supports unrestricted immigration and benefits for illegals.

Hillarys solution was to straddle and hedge, but she couldnt pull it off. Obama and Edwards quickly jumped in to decry her evasive and slippery answers. Following the debate Edwards used Hillarys awkward and confusing answers to create a devastating ad that was quickly linked across the Internet and seemed to breathe new life into his campaign. Soon even Hillary had to admit the debate wasnt her best performance.

These weaknesses have not only given her primary opponents new life, but have exposed liabilities for the general election. Despite a sizable advantage for Democrats in generic ballot polling, Hillary is virtually tied with GOP candidates Rudy Giuliani and John McCain.

What her recent stumbles reveal is that Hillary is vulnerable. She is attempting a precarious balancing act. She needs to attract and hold the support of liberals while at the same time leaving room to move to the center. But this requires a finesse that Hillary, unlike her husband, lacks. Every time she tries to avoid being pinned down on difficult issues like social security, immigration, and taxes she highlights doubts about her honesty and voters trust. Doubts her opponents are sure to reinforce.

And the more these attacks tarnish Hillarys inevitability the more doubts are raised about her electability. During the debate Senator Chris Dodd spoke openly about Hillarys un-electability and continues to discuss it on the campaign trail. The more these doubts are discussed the more chance they have to grow.

The only way to stop Hillary is to continue to apply the pressure and keep the focus on Hillarys weaknesses. Hillary is a committed and experienced campaigner with millions of dollars on hand; she wont go down without a fight.

But the last few weeks have shown that she is anything but invincible.

Richard H. Collins is the founder of StopHerNow.com, a website dedicated to educating the public about Hillary Clintons liberal record.

Originaly from Source

01.26.08

Eliminate All Taxation on Business Income

Posted in Economic at 10:05 pm by admin

I’ve been hesitant to post anything since I proved the “Blackhedd Effect” once again the other day (when my story on the weak dollar preceded a 360-plus drop in the stock market).

I will point out that dollar weakness has continued. Surprising and worrisome strength in the Japanese yen (which is not the same effect) has also appeared in the last two days. The European Central Bank have left their benchmark interest rate untouched and the euro will be strengthening further.

Meanwhile, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke tried to sound measured and reasonable about the inflation threat in remarks to Congress yesterday, and the markets have rewarded him with a big Bronx cheer. A firm expectation that the Fed will cut rates still more in an attempt to fend off a US recession is now baked into bond and financial futures prices.

Somebody needs to say it. It’s time for a total reverse in the slide toward economic populism that is taking over our politics this season. Our government needs to stop doing everything that it does to make American businesses less competitive in the world.

Read on…

The question is about balance in our priorities as a nation.

People engage in economic activity in order to improve their material wellbeing. It’s true that wealth doesn’t buy happiness. But poverty doesn’t buy anything. Material self-sufficiency is a pre-requisite to the pursuits that actually make life worth living.

In addition, the American nation is committed to freedom. Now it serendipitously turns out that free markets produce the most wealth, and so the basic framework of American life has created the conditions under which we the people have made ourselves the richest on earth.

It also turns out that free individuals operating freely will produce different outcomes depending on a range of factors. Life turns out not to be fair. Just as the poor will always be with us, it seems also that the rich will always be with us as well.

And that’s where the question of balance comes in.

Ever since humanity awoke, people have felt stung by the success of others, and have sought to attenuate or share it. In our nation and our day, this takes the form of economic populism, or in the word used by its adherents, progressive politics.

It’s the sense of our great nation that a balance must be struck between each individual’s freedom, and (what is just as well-founded in morality) the right of each individual not to have less material wealth than any other.

And so, throughout the Twentieth Century, we have systematically (and progressively) added restrictions on the ability of businesses to operate freely and to profit from their activities.

This trend is now at a high tide, as the Democratic Party roars with one proposal after another to socialize large chunks of our economy, increase taxes on the most productive individuals, strengthen the influence of labor unions, stiffen environmental regulations, and even to export all these destructive ideas to other countries in the form of restrictions in free [sic] trade agreements.

Ladies and gentlemen, is it any wonder that the US dollar is at historic lows vis-a-vis the other currencies of the world, and bodes to fall still further, perhaps much further?

And in the meantime, the Republican Party, which we ought to support and defend here in this conservative political forum, is doing exactly nothing to counter the wild mania among the Democratic progressives to reverse the prosperity and wellbeing of this great and essential nation.

WE MUST STAND UP AND DEMAND THAT OUR SOCIETY AND OUR GOVERNMENT SHALL SET AMERICAN BUSINESS FREE.

First, absolutely and everywhere: eliminate all taxes on corporate profits and capital gains. Do this now, in every jurisdiction. Business profits should be absolutely free of taxation, with a corporate income-tax rate of not 30.5% as in Chairman Rangel’s current legislation, but zero.

The reductions on capital gains taxes now scheduled to expire in 2010 should be extended and made permanent, with a capgains tax rate of zero.

Taxes should be eliminated on the revenue from any product or service produced on American soil for export. Do this now and everywhere.

Let’s get started on this, people. The foreign-exchange value of the US dollar is falling because there is a decreasing amount of things produced by Americans in America and priced in dollars that people in other countries want to buy. Unless we fundamentally change the restrictive conditions under which American businesspeople operate, this will continue with no end in sight.

In their manic and vain attempt to produce economic fairness and social equality, the progressive Democratic Party is entirely happy to wipe out the means by which Americans compete in global markets. This is wrong, and must end.

It’s time to shift the balance that American politics seeks, away from egalitarianism and toward prosperity. This must be the job of the Republican Party, whose leaders perversely are fiddling while Rome burns. We need new faces and new forces in the Republican Party, who will say without apology that the business of America is business.

It’s now or never, people. It’s now or never.

Originaly from Source

Corruption’s Cause

Posted in Economic at 9:15 pm by admin

From the diaries by Leon…

I had an interesting moment yesterday. I met up with a friend at a Giordanos Pizza in Naperville, IL and had ordered a coke with my sandwich. When the waitress brought me the bill I noticed she had not charged me for my drink. What ran through my mind was an event in college where while working at a restaurant, a co-worker was fired on the spot for giving a free drink to a friend. I quickly thought that would be last thing I would want to see happen to this young girl, although not a friend of hers, so I alerted her to the discrepancy so she could change the bill.

Read on…

Her reaction was pretty amazing in my point of view. Her face lit up with a huge smile and she said Wow! and Thank You! many times. I felt pretty embarrassed. And she clearly was amazed that someone had the honesty to alert her to this situation. Now I have some worse character flaws than stealing a 2-dollar drink, but this was an interesting event to reflect on.

The drink was under $2. The median income for this upper middle class Chicago suburb is $112,258. I have students that drive Mercedes, and all the other typical clich behavior you would come to expect in other Chicago suburbs like Winnetka and Glencoe. Most people here could use $2 bills for Kleenex and not know the difference.

Recently, Dan Proft wrote a post on how the core problem with Illinois government was not Governor Blagojevich but our legislature who has no idea of how to provide an effective balance to his corruption.

The forcible extraction and distribution of $59 billion of other people’s money is what perverts our economy and our politics. The extractors and distributors are merely the implementation tools.

The process of doling out $59 billion worth of goodies sustains the permanent political class currently inflicted upon Illinois, including a General Assembly whose work is seemingly never done.

Interminable attention is paid to the money politicians raise and spend to run for office but campaign cash is relatively incidental. If spending limits were properly applied to government, concerns about influence-peddling would take care of themselves for the simple fact that there would be less influence to peddle.

With or without Governor Blagojevich, nothing will change in Illinois until Illinoisans recall the principles of limited government and subsequently demand that their money be recalled from Springfield.

I wouldnt argue with him on any of this and his third paragraph is a very astute observation, yet I think the root runs a little deeper. The root cause of Illinoiss corruption, and I would venture to say that of sustained corruption in general, is that apparently in Naperville, Illinois integrity is now valued at less then $2.

I am not here to preach to others, because I would never say that I am myself a saint. I am here to say that that the day the public no longer accepts the hand-in-the-cookie-jar-legislative mentality exhibited in Illinois and the scandals of the Bill Clintons and Rod Blagojevichs of the world, will come a few days after 20 year old waitresses in Naperville, Illinois are no longer overwhelmed by someone correcting a $2 mistake.

www.illinoisreview.com
www.mymanmitt.com
www.race42008.com

Originaly from Source

Bring it, Nancy.

Posted in Economic at 8:25 pm by admin

Or are you just trying to throw a bone to your base?

New Iraq measure would require withdrawal

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Thursday she would bring a new Iraq measure to the House floor shortly to provide $50 billion in funds for the war, while requiring U.S. troops to begin redeploying out of Iraq immediately and conclude by the end of next year.

- Because I don’t think that it’s going to work this time, Madame Speaker. They’re pretty ticked off at the way that the Senate confirmed Mukasey 53-40 (odd how all the Democratic Senators running for President had somewhere else to be?), not to mention that little incident where House Democrats ran away from a Cheney impeachment like scared little bunnies. You went one too many times from that well, Madame Speaker, and you and yours have no-one to blame except you if it starts going dry.

So let’s get this over with - and do you even have a simple majority?

Are you sure?

Read the rest of this entry »

01.25.08

India, China trade to be $40 billion by 2010

Posted in Economic at 9:55 pm by admin

India, China trade to be $40 billion by 2010 : India Business

New Delhi, Nov 6 - India and China are poised to achieve bilateral trade of up to $40 billion (Rs.1.6 trillion) by 2010, Chinese ambassador Sun Yuxi said here Tuesday.

‘China and India’s bilateral relations witnessed all round development three years ago. In 2004, our trade was less than $14 billion but now till the end of October, trade has gone up to $27 billion,’ Yuxi told a conference organised by the Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO).

‘This year we will well be crossing $30 billion and our target for 2010 is $40 billion, which is three years away. If we grow in this way, personally I think we can aim for $50 billion by 2010,’ he added.

He also said that both countries are currently negotiating a trade agreement.

‘We are working on something what is called a regional trade agreement, which is on similar terms as a free trade agreement,’ he said.

‘Our trade is developing very fast, faster than expected by our respective governments,’ Yuxi said, adding that both countries have become partners in economic development.

Originaly from Source

World’s No. 1 management guru is an Indian

Posted in Economic at 9:05 pm by admin

World’s No. 1 guru is an Indian
8 Nov 2007, 0014 hrs IST,Neelima Mahajan,TNN

SMS NEWS to 58888 for latest updates
/photo.cms?msid=2526770
C K Prahalad has been declared the worlds foremost management guru (TOI Photo)
MUMBAI: India gave the world the word guru. And now, an Indian has been declared the worlds foremost management guru. C K Prahalad, professor at the University of Michigans Stephen M Ross School of Business, has been crowned the greatest management thinker alive by Thinkers 50, an annual ranking of the top 50 management thought leaders in the world.

In this years Thinkers 50 released in London on Wednesday Prahalad (No. 3 last year) has trumped the likes of former US Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan, strategy guru Michael Porter and Microsoft founder Bill Gates to emerge as No. 1.

There are three other Indians in the top 50: CEO coach Ram Charan at No. 22 (up from No. 24 last year), innovation guru Vijay Govindarajan of the Tuck Business School at No. 23 (No. 31 last year); and Harvards Rakesh Khurana at No. 45 (No. 33 last year).

“Not many management thinkers actually follow up important early ideas with genuinely groundbreaking future ideas. This is what C K Prahalad has managed to do. His work with Gary Hamel set the strategic agenda of the 1990s. Now, with “The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid”, he has established the social, entrepreneurial and economic agenda of our times,” said Stuart Crainer and Des Dearlove of Suntop Media, the organisation which brings out the Thinkers 50 ranking.

Originaly from Source

« Previous entries · Next entries »