05.11.08

The Sunday Morning Talk Shows - preview

Posted in Economic at 8:20 pm by

For Sunday, December 2, 2007

Image

FOX News Sunday (FNS): Host Chris Wallace talks to General David Petraeus about the latest in Iraq.

Meet the Press (NBC): Tim Russert talks to Republican Presidential Hopeful Ron Paul.

This Week (ABC): Host George Stephanopoulos talks to Republican Presidential Hopeful Rudy Giuliani.

Face the Nation (CBS): Host Bob Schieffer takes a nap talks to Dem Presidential hopeful Barack Hussein Obama and GOP Presidential hopeful Michael Dale Huckabee.

Late Edition (CNN): Host Wolf Blitzer probably won’t be there. CNN is running with old interviews. It’s an end-o’-th’-year thaang, and I don’t know how they will top it next week, as we near the actual end of the year.
=========================

Okay, Wallace will talk to General Petraeus. Honest question: Why does anyone give a damn what the editorial board of TIME infotainment mag thinks about the news from their politically warped (and limited) purview?

I wonder what types of questions Russert will ask Ron Paul. I hope we get some hilarious gold standard stuff, but no doubt the two will chat mostly about Iraq.

Then there’s Rudy on TW and Barry & Mike on FTN.

Should be loads of fun, and I’ll have the review here at RedState.com.

Originaly from Source

05.10.08

Before And After

Posted in Economic at 9:50 pm by

Before:

As Congressional Democrats sought to reconcile their differences and send an Iraq spending bill to the White House, Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, said Thursday that “this war is lost,” a stark assessment that Republicans argued would demoralize American troops fighting in Iraq.

[. . .]

“I believe myself that the secretary of state, secretary of defense and — you have to make your own decisions as to what the president knows — that this war is lost and the surge is not accomplishing anything as indicated by the extreme violence in Iraq,” Mr. Reid said.

After (quoting Reid):

. . . The president said, “Let’s send some more troops over there, and that will give the Iraqis the time to take care of themselves.” We sent other troops over there, and there are a lot of reasons the surge certainly hasn’t hurt. It’s helped. I recognize that.

Originaly from Source

Missing A Key Part Of That Economic Legacy

Posted in Economic at 9:00 pm by

The Washington Post reports that Hillary Clinton has finally decided to embrace her husband’s legacy in her run for the Presidency. Among the reasons for this earthshaking tactical decision is the following:

Obama has made challenging the 1990s a mainstay of his platform, saying it is time to “turn the page” on the partisanship — and implicitly the scandals — of the Clinton era. This is a major part of his case that he is the most electable Democrat, able to expand the electoral base to states where Hillary Clinton is still viewed as polarizing.

But the Clintons regard any discussion of the Nineties to be good for them, evoking memories of a booming economy and a time when the United States enjoyed greater popularity around the world.

And of course, Hillary Clinton wants to throw into the trash heap of history one of the major policy initiatives that helped bring about “a booming economy” and “greater popularity” for the United States; free trade. There are few more reliable routes to economic prosperity than trade liberalization and to Bill Clinton’s credit, he recognized and acted on that fact when he was President.

Too bad both Clintons have backtracked from that stance in the effort to elect Hillary Clinton President. Power should never be achieved as a goal in and of itself. It should be achieved in the service of more noble efforts. Whether the Clintons have adopted their new trade stance because of expediency (the most likely possibility) or because they suddenly, genuinely believe in protectionism, their stance on trade does them no honor. And if implemented, it would do the country a lot of harm.

Originaly from Source

Man Of The Year

Posted in Economic at 8:10 pm by

General David Petraeus. I say again that I don’t really have a problem with Time’s choice since its Person of the Year “honor” is no honor at all. It recognizes the most consequential newsmaker whether or not that newsmaker was on the side of Light or Darkness. Kristol misses that distinction in his article. But for all that he was able to accomplish, I certainly think that General Petraeus was deserving of recognition. Time’s choice was defensible but it nevertheless should have put the General on the front cover of its magazine.

Read the rest of this entry »

05.09.08

Merry Christmas

Posted in Economic at 9:40 pm by

Yes, I know Pejman put this in RedHot, but as it is not really a candidate advertisement and is really very much about our soldiers in harms way, I want this on the front.

Well done and let me just say, “Ditto.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Leaving Arizona

Posted in Economic at 8:50 pm by

Illegal Aliens are packing up and leaving Arizona.

Arizona enacted a new law in an attempt to lessen economic incentives for illegal aliens. Under the new law, which takes effect January 1, businesses found to have knowingly hired illegal workers will be subject to sanctions from probation to a 10-day suspension of their business licenses. A second violation would bring permanent revocation of the license.

Arizona employers have started to fire workers who can’t prove they are in the country legally. As a result illegal aliens are returning to their home countries or moving other states.

The departure of the illegals from Arizona proves that attrition by enforcement works. When illegal aliens don’t have jobs, they don’t stick around.

Fred got it right.

Read the rest of this entry »

The New York Philharmonic Goes to Pyongyang

Posted in Economic at 8:00 pm by

You’ve heard that the New York Philharmonic is going on tour to the hermit kingdom of North Korea. I’ll admit when the definitive news came out a couple of weeks ago, I was darned surprised. I’d heard various things about this through the grapevine since August or so, and I’d have bet a lot of money that it wouldn’t happen.

Needless to say, the politics of this are fraught, and subject to a range of interpretations. Here’s some additional background and context, for those of you who have never been involved in planning and executing a tour by a major performing-arts organization. (As it turns out, I have.)

Read on…

First of all, the Philharmonic is my big hometown band. I have several acquaintances and old schoolmates among the musicians, and I love hearing them whenever I get the chance. They have a well-deserved reputation as a wild bunch. During the tenure of music director emeritus Kurt Masur, they overcame a serious tendency to morale problems, and are now as consistent as you please. They’re one of America’s Big Five symphony orchestras, and on any given night they can be the best in the world.

American symphony orchestras have a distinguished history as cultural ambassadors in politically challenging settings. The Philharmonic traveled to the Soviet Union in 1959 with then-music director Leonard Bernstein, and to Israel in 1948. The Philadelphia Orchestra went to the People’s Republic of China in 1973. These tours and others like them of course were triumphs, both artistically and diplomatically.

Going on an international tour is a vast undertaking for a major arts organization, and this one is no different. The tour is being funded by Credit Suisse First Boston, among others, and will run for three weeks in February 2008. The original tour plans called for performances in Taipei, Hong Kong, Shanghai and Beijing. Music director Lorin Maazel has programmed mostly unadventurous repertoire, consisting mostly of nineteenth-century warhorses (with the Barber Violin Concerto and Gershwin’s An American in Paris as the only exceptions).

After the overture from the North Koreans, the orchestra arranged to add two additional performances to the tour: one in Seoul and one in Pyongyang, two days apart. The orchestra will spend two days in the North, traveling on an plane chartered from a South Korean airline. (The tour consists of about 250 people and about 100 musical instruments, some of them very large, and most of them very temperamental.) While in the North, orchestra members will give master classes, and a rehearsal that will be open to professional musicians and students, in addition to their concert performance.

Contrary to some reports, the Philharmonic will not be performing Handel’s Messiah on tour. Being an oratorio with large chorus and four vocal soloists, the Handel would have required traveling perhaps 200 additional personnel. Not bloody likely.

Philharmonic management, led by President Zarin Mehta, insisted on a set of special conditions before agreeing to perform in Pyongyang. (And yes, Zarin is related to conductor Zubin Mehta, the former Philharmonic music director and current music director of the Israel Philharmonic: they’re brothers.)

The North Koreans agreed to allow foreign journalists to attend the concert, which means we ought to get reasonably unbiased reviews. The orchestra will be allowed to open their concert by playing The Star-Spangled Banner. Importantly, the Koreans also agreed to broadcast the performance via live radio throughout North Korea, to address the concern that only an audience of hand-picked political elites would hear it.

Among the private citizens and organizations who are quietly acting as sherpas in this undertaking, it’s noteworthy that the South Koreans appear to have taken a major role. I’ve long had the belief (from talking to friends and associates from South Korea) that they expect the peninsula to be reunified in the next ten to fifteen years, but no one is in any hurry to force the issue. Though few will say it, one suspects that Kim Jong-Il (now in his mid-60s) will need to die first.

Americans often suspect the South Koreans of coddling the Northern dictator out of a lack of backbone. That may or may not be true. But it certainly is the case that no resolution to the North Korean situation (either in its nuclear-security or its humanitarian dimensions) can come without the full cooperation of people in the South.

Some Americans, notably John Bolton, have spoken out against the Philharmonic’s North Korean adventure. They argue, reasonably, that nothing should be done to give credibility and prestige to a hostile regime at a time when our Administration is engaged in delicate negotiations with them over the nuclear issue.

But now that the tour is a done deal, it’s worth recalling the illustrious history of American cultural ambassadors to non-free lands, by way of at least looking at the bright side.

It’s far too much to hope that a tour by a symphony orchestra will end the isolation of North Korea, and the oppression of the North Koreans by their own rulers.

But it’s worth hoping that, by seeing and hearing some of the most wonderful people in America at the top of their game, some North Koreans will start to realize that there are other, and better, ways to run their country. And it may help them look ahead to the end of their isolation.

To the guys and ladies I know in the New York Philharmonic: Have a great trip, play well, and carry the American flag high! And I can’t wait to hear your stories when you get back.

Originaly from Source

Okie Attorney General Bans Christmas. Seriously.

Posted in Economic at 1:41 am by

Drew Edmondson is the out of control Oklahoma Attorney General. Recently he rounded up conservative activists and threw them in jail for circulating petitions to get conservatives on the ballot.

Now, however, Drew Edmondson has done something even nuttier. He has issued an advisory opinion from the Attorney General’s Office directing universities in Oklahoma to refrain from using the word “Christmas.”

Mark Tapscott with the Washington Examiner has the details. Mark notes, “Edmondson’s issued an advisory opinion to officials at Southwestern Oklahoma State University in Weatherford advising them that the word “Christmas” should not be spoken by any employee of the state school, not written in any official holiday decorations.”

Attorney General Edmondson can be reached at 405-521-3921. Call and wish him a Merry Christmas and ask why he banned the word.

Read the rest of this entry »

05.08.08

I Really Don’t Get The Clinton Campaign

Posted in Economic at 9:32 pm by

Once a well-oiled machine that seemed to be able to do no wrong, it now demonstrates that it has a remarkable and bizarre instinct for the capillaries. I mean, honestly; who cares if Obama voted “Present” a bunch of times as an Illinois state legislator. Does the Clinton campaign really want to get into that? Because I can promise you that there have been more than a few occasions where Senator Clinton herself has voted “Present” on legislation. Does she really think that voters are going to base their choices on who took cover at what time under the umbrella of Robert’s Rules of Order or other authorities concerning parliamentary procedure?

Just watch: After the Obama campaign responds to this, we will have a “Whatever happened to the ‘politics of hope’?” emission from the Clinton machine. Because, of course, when Barack Obama started using the word “hope” in campaigns, what he really meant was “I’m going to drop my fists to my sides and let my political opponents use me as a punching bag. God knows, it’s the only honorable thing to do.”

By the way, for those of you too young to remember, this is indirect evidence demonstrating just how terrible George Herbert Walker Bush’s re-election campaign was in 1992. Weren’t the Clintons supposed to get better at campaigning as time went by?

Originaly from Source

This ad is crap

Posted in Economic at 8:42 pm by


From the woman who said, “I have a million ideas. The country can’t afford them all.” Hellavaway to reinforce that notion.

Notice she does not wish anyone a Merry Christmas. Notice she does not even write down her agenda items. They’re handed to her in pre-printed Marker Felt fonted (one of the silliest, ugliest, most uninspired fonts every made) index cards is Bill standing outside the camera shot going over the poll tested issues list and checking it twice?

This is just crap. This campaign is a Marker Felt campaign — pre-printed, silly, ugly, and uninspired.

Read the rest of this entry »

« Previous entries